Varieties of Hedonism in Feldman's Pleasure and the Good Life
نویسنده
چکیده
Tbere is mucb to admire in Fred Feldman's Pleasure and the Good Life,^ and mucb witb wbicb to agree. It is a wondei-ful exploration of varieties of bedonism, and a demonstration of tbe plasticity of tbe very concept of bedonism. Feldman succeeds ably in arguing tbat most, if not all, of tbe traditional arguments against bedonism can be met by different versions of tbe tbeory, all of tbem versions of wbat be calls 'attitudinal bedonism'. We don't get a fully worked-out presentation of tbe One True Version, but we do get plenty of bints about tbe version be prefers. In tbis essay I will raise some questions, and some misgivings I bave about different versions of bedonism. Wbetber tbese misgivings rise to tbe level of disagreement witb Feldman will depend largely on tbe extent to wbicb be is prepared to endorse, as opposed merely to explore, tbe bedonism in question.
منابع مشابه
Abstract of Book
Hedonism is the view that the Good Life is the pleasant life. The central aim of this book is to show that, when carefully and charitably interpreted, certain forms of hedonism yield plausible evaluations of human lives. The forms I defend understand pleasure as intrinsic attitudinal pleasure. I reject all forms of sensory hedonism. I defend my preferred forms of hedonism against a barrage of c...
متن کاملObjectivity and Perfection in Hume’s Hedonism
David Hume’s value theory—in particular, his theory of prudential value or self-interest—is rarely investigated in any depth. Though he makes a number of claims about what is in someone’s interest (including his discussion of the prudential value of the virtues in the second Enquiry1), there is very little material in Hume’s philosophic writing that yields a clear statement of his theory of wha...
متن کاملAn Introduction to Ill-Being
A person can be better or worse off. Lives can go better or worse. How does this happen? The obvious and natural suggestion is that lives vary in terms of how much good they contain, and how much bad. That is to say, the overall level of one’s well-being is a function of both the good contained within the life and the bad contained within it. Somewhat more precisely, there are elements which th...
متن کاملThe Hedonist’s Dilemma
It is common to group theories of well-being into the following three categories: hedonism (the view that pleasure is the sole prudential good; pain the sole bad), desire-satisfactionism (a wide swath of views that claim, roughly speaking, that a person’s welfare depends on the satisfaction of her desires), and the objective-list (the view that prudential value is independent of an agent’s pro-...
متن کاملTwo types of psychological hedonism.
I develop a distinction between two types of psychological hedonism. Inferential hedonism (or "I-hedonism") holds that each person only has ultimate desires regarding his or her own hedonic states (pleasure and pain). Reinforcement hedonism (or "R-hedonism") holds that each person's ultimate desires, whatever their contents are, are differentially reinforced in that person's cognitive system on...
متن کامل